Another in this series.
One thing that I, and indeed many people, find infuriating about this regime is that nothing gets attention until someone is killed. The Roy McSweeney, Klonda Richey, Jordyn Arndt, etc.. etc... ad nauseum scenarios were all preceded by months, sometimes years, of atrocious, barbaric behavior on the part of dogs and their owners for which there was no intervention.
Remember, Fido has been granted absolute moral authority. Whatever Dog does is well and good because... Dog is doing it! If a jogger gets attacked, or the UPS guy winds up in the hospital.... no shits given. The victim is held accountable and everything is just peachy in Dogville!
Over 4 MILLION Americans are bitten by dogs each year, with about 400,000 of those requiring hospital emergency room visits. Where is the outrage at that? NONE ... because we are conditioned to love Fido no matter what. Again, Fido has Moral Authority! Extending that to a few dozen killed, well.... that is just statistical noise. Don't you think that Fido, in His infinite wisdom, may see fit to take the lives of a few useless 2-leggers each year? Who are we mere mortals to challenge the wisdom of Dog?
Of course, some folks are going to argue that "there is a big difference between a bite and a mauling". Where do you draw the precise line between a bite and a mauling? Why is it that bites are perfectly OK, but maulings are not? Why are "maulings" of huge societal import but "bites" are irrelevant? Is not the level of accountability the same in either case?
Lets consider this analogy: You get drunk, drive, run a red light and hit my car. That crash (I won't call it an accident) was your fault. You are responsible. Now, the results of the crash could be anything from a minor fender-bender to me winding up in the morgue, but the precise outcome is not really relevant to who owns that outcome. Again, you are at fault. You made it happen. Its not like you just get to say "Hey, the damages were only a few grand.... I'll take my keys and go home now". NO. That is not the way it works!
Pursuant to that, dog owners own those 400,000 emergency room visits. When a GSD runs into the street and attacks a jogger, the dog owner owns that scenario. Again, accountability does not vary according to outcome: If its your dog, its your problem.
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
Saturday, January 16, 2016
BSL Collapse 4.0: Drain the Swamp
Another in this series.
'Twas another DBRF in Miami last month. Hey, aren't Pits BANNED in Miami? Didn't the Miami electorate vote to uphold that BAN by an overwhelming margin? In a recent comment section, I did a back of the envelope computation and came to the conclusion that Pit Bull related homicides are more likely in pit bull "free" Miami than the nation at large. Why is that?
Lets check out Miami-Dade's Animal Services pets of the week.
Cici is a 1-year-old Brindle Terrier mix in search of a loving forever companion that will shower her with lots of hugs and kisses. Connect, adopt and fall in love with Cici at Miami-Dade Animal Services.
[EDIT: It appears Miami-Dade Animal Services has updated the page and the photo has changed. I have re-posted CICI's photo]
See, there is the answer to the Pit Bull problem right there: Simply call them all something else and Voila! No more Pit Bulls!
The hideous beast depicted above literally screams "PIT BULL!!!" yet a city agency is GIVING THEM AWAY in defiance of local law. This isn't the first time this has happened, either: I have written about this problem previously. And, the cheeky SOB's are doing it right out in the open! Typical dog worshipers, giving the proverbial middle finger to everybody!
This is what happens when your ass is in front of your head. That little piece of paper may say that there are no pit bulls allowed within city limits, but with the dog culture in full force you'd have a better chance of enforcing a ban on Catholicism at the Vatican.
Did you BSL folks really think you could just pass this law and walk away?
While the electorate appears to favor some controls, nothing is accomplished because city agencies and other authorities are staffed with dog worshipers, animal rights nutters, and various other miscreants with an interest in maintaining the dog owning overclass. These foul degenerates will do everything they can to make sure that any laws that are passed are NOT enforced. This goes for biting, barking, dog at large and YES breed restrictions!
Always consider the Ten Commandments! Any breed restriction is a violation of just about all of them. When you have an enforcement apparatus loaded with dog cultists, you can pretty much count on any "anti-dog" statutes being ignored. Hell, I would not be surprised if reporting an illegal pit in Miami got you arrested for harassment! How dare you critique the almighty dog! Fido is a "Lab Mix" and how dare you say otherwise!
Consider the root word of "enFORCEment". All policy reduces to the use of force at some point. No animal rights cultist or dog fanatic is going to use force against a dog or an owner. These types need to be purged, with extreme prejudice, from ALL positions of authority.
While the above proposition seems rather harsh, its the only path to improvement. Anyone who adheres to criminal ideologies, i.e. Animal Rightism, Dog Worship, Dog Fighting, etc... etc... must be terminated from ANY and ALL positions of authority. You wouldn't hire a NAMBLA activist to be a child care director, would you? While people have freedom of speech and expression, WE THE PEOPLE have a right to choose who enFORCEs our animal control statutes. These degenerates need to take their poisonous ideologies and hit the road! This conflict of interest cannot be allowed to continue.
'Twas another DBRF in Miami last month. Hey, aren't Pits BANNED in Miami? Didn't the Miami electorate vote to uphold that BAN by an overwhelming margin? In a recent comment section, I did a back of the envelope computation and came to the conclusion that Pit Bull related homicides are more likely in pit bull "free" Miami than the nation at large. Why is that?
Lets check out Miami-Dade's Animal Services pets of the week.
Cici is a 1-year-old Brindle Terrier mix in search of a loving forever companion that will shower her with lots of hugs and kisses. Connect, adopt and fall in love with Cici at Miami-Dade Animal Services.
[EDIT: It appears Miami-Dade Animal Services has updated the page and the photo has changed. I have re-posted CICI's photo]
See, there is the answer to the Pit Bull problem right there: Simply call them all something else and Voila! No more Pit Bulls!
The hideous beast depicted above literally screams "PIT BULL!!!" yet a city agency is GIVING THEM AWAY in defiance of local law. This isn't the first time this has happened, either: I have written about this problem previously. And, the cheeky SOB's are doing it right out in the open! Typical dog worshipers, giving the proverbial middle finger to everybody!
This is what happens when your ass is in front of your head. That little piece of paper may say that there are no pit bulls allowed within city limits, but with the dog culture in full force you'd have a better chance of enforcing a ban on Catholicism at the Vatican.
Did you BSL folks really think you could just pass this law and walk away?
While the electorate appears to favor some controls, nothing is accomplished because city agencies and other authorities are staffed with dog worshipers, animal rights nutters, and various other miscreants with an interest in maintaining the dog owning overclass. These foul degenerates will do everything they can to make sure that any laws that are passed are NOT enforced. This goes for biting, barking, dog at large and YES breed restrictions!
Always consider the Ten Commandments! Any breed restriction is a violation of just about all of them. When you have an enforcement apparatus loaded with dog cultists, you can pretty much count on any "anti-dog" statutes being ignored. Hell, I would not be surprised if reporting an illegal pit in Miami got you arrested for harassment! How dare you critique the almighty dog! Fido is a "Lab Mix" and how dare you say otherwise!
Consider the root word of "enFORCEment". All policy reduces to the use of force at some point. No animal rights cultist or dog fanatic is going to use force against a dog or an owner. These types need to be purged, with extreme prejudice, from ALL positions of authority.
While the above proposition seems rather harsh, its the only path to improvement. Anyone who adheres to criminal ideologies, i.e. Animal Rightism, Dog Worship, Dog Fighting, etc... etc... must be terminated from ANY and ALL positions of authority. You wouldn't hire a NAMBLA activist to be a child care director, would you? While people have freedom of speech and expression, WE THE PEOPLE have a right to choose who enFORCEs our animal control statutes. These degenerates need to take their poisonous ideologies and hit the road! This conflict of interest cannot be allowed to continue.
Saturday, January 9, 2016
What time is it?
Happy New Year, all!
2015 was a GREAT year for Fido. A pit bull kills another in Miami... where they are banned! Indeed, the city is giving away banned pit bulls! How much better can it get?
On a related note, we now have the first "suicide by dog" in history! "O cruel world! I must depart this mortal coil! I must ignore all those nasty knives, firearms, pills, large bodies of water and tall buildings! I will end my live by.... diving into a backyard full of pit bulls(?)" Maybe its just me, but this seems a little far fetched to me. Perhaps the "official" outcome was, ahem, "influenced" by the fact that a local cop owned the property in question? This is shaping up to be a major scandal.
And, of course, we have the 9 year old boy living in a small travel trailer killed by his sister's 3 pit bulls. Again, (and again, and again...) a pack of large dogs in a small camper is SUCH a good idea, isn't it? The sister may go to jail, and yadda, yadda, yadda... but nothing ever really changes, now does it?
Happy 2016 folks!
[EDIT] Here is a video of Griffin-Heady's pit bulls. You know, the dogs that killed her brother? Get it while the getting is good... probably won't be on youtube for long:
Saturday, December 12, 2015
BSL Collapse 3.1 - Why, indeed?
Commenter Dog People Are Nuts (DPAN) made a great comment the other day. It was in response to this comment on the last page:
Maybe they aren't 'real dogs' though. If pit bulls are successfully banned, it will be easier to ban the next mauler.
Divide and conquer ;)
DPAN's response to that was [with my comments in bold]:
It's not tackling the root of the problem. Why have pitbulls been allowed to even get this out of control? Because they are dogs. Would mutant cats or budgies have been allowed to kill over 20 people per year with impunity? [in a word...NOPE] Hell no; a single death would cause a massive outcry and the breed would be outlawed and forced into extinction.
If BSL is passed, don't expect it to be enforced. Pits are banned where I live [where is that] and I see them all the time (and yes, I've reported them when I know where they live). Why? Because if no one has the guts to enforce even the most basic dog laws, no one would be meeean enough to deprive someone of their BEST FRIEND doggie woggie and then have it put down just because it's the wrong breed, which it can't help! Aww, look, it's wagging its tail! [This sums the core issue to perfection]
Some of these bans wouldn't be necessary if the dog laws that already existed were sufficiently enforced: Leash laws, containment laws, laws pertaining to declared dangerous dogs (eg. muzzling), breeding laws, licensing laws, number if permitted pets laws, bans on individuals from having dogs/pets. If these aren't enforced, why would BSL? [because the laws of DOG are above those of MAN]
The above addresses the core issue: We are expected to worship each and every dog, and to put Dog's interests above all other. Indeed, WHY would BSL restrictions be considered by us mere mortal humans?
I live in the U.S. State of Florida. Florida has "pre-emption" laws, thereby prohibiting local entities from imposing ANY sort of breed specific legislation. As much as I love Florida, I consider this complete BS.
Certain cities were allowed to "grandfather in" their pre-existing BSL restrictions. This includes the city of Miami and a few other places.
Now, Miami has been host to TWO DBRF's within about a year of each other:
Devon Jade killed by Pit Bulls. Consider: Pit bulls are not allowed in Miami-Dade County. And, this: Yep, look like full-blown SHIT BULLS to me!
Carmen Reigata killed by dogs (pit "mixes" wink, wink).
Lets crunch some numbers:
- Miami / Dade USA: 5.5 million population.
- United States: 322 million population.
DBRF's in Miami - 1 per year the past 2 years.
DBRF's in USA - 42 per year, as per 2014 statistics.
So, statistically:
You have a 1 in 5.5 million chance of being killed by a dog in Miami.
You have a 1 in 7.6 million chance of being killed by a dog in the greater USA.
From that we can determine that, currently, Miami people have an above average probability of being killed by a dog than your average American. This is in spite of Miami's Pit Bull ban!
See how easy it is to play with numbers? I can set the goalposts anywhere I want. I can "prove" that pit bulls kill less than 1 person every 5 years if I go back to, say, 5000 BC! In any case, statistically, I just destroyed Miami's pit bull restriction even though I find it perfectly legitimate.
In any case, as DPAN pointed out, BSL will wash out in the face of the overall dog culture. The key to a pit bull (or any sort of doggie restriction) is to FIRST undermine the canine supremacy movement. When that is done, THEN and only THEN will the BSL restriction take hold.
Have a great weekend!
Maybe they aren't 'real dogs' though. If pit bulls are successfully banned, it will be easier to ban the next mauler.
Divide and conquer ;)
DPAN's response to that was [with my comments in bold]:
It's not tackling the root of the problem. Why have pitbulls been allowed to even get this out of control? Because they are dogs. Would mutant cats or budgies have been allowed to kill over 20 people per year with impunity? [in a word...NOPE] Hell no; a single death would cause a massive outcry and the breed would be outlawed and forced into extinction.
If BSL is passed, don't expect it to be enforced. Pits are banned where I live [where is that] and I see them all the time (and yes, I've reported them when I know where they live). Why? Because if no one has the guts to enforce even the most basic dog laws, no one would be meeean enough to deprive someone of their BEST FRIEND doggie woggie and then have it put down just because it's the wrong breed, which it can't help! Aww, look, it's wagging its tail! [This sums the core issue to perfection]
Some of these bans wouldn't be necessary if the dog laws that already existed were sufficiently enforced: Leash laws, containment laws, laws pertaining to declared dangerous dogs (eg. muzzling), breeding laws, licensing laws, number if permitted pets laws, bans on individuals from having dogs/pets. If these aren't enforced, why would BSL? [because the laws of DOG are above those of MAN]
The above addresses the core issue: We are expected to worship each and every dog, and to put Dog's interests above all other. Indeed, WHY would BSL restrictions be considered by us mere mortal humans?
I live in the U.S. State of Florida. Florida has "pre-emption" laws, thereby prohibiting local entities from imposing ANY sort of breed specific legislation. As much as I love Florida, I consider this complete BS.
Certain cities were allowed to "grandfather in" their pre-existing BSL restrictions. This includes the city of Miami and a few other places.
Now, Miami has been host to TWO DBRF's within about a year of each other:
Devon Jade killed by Pit Bulls. Consider: Pit bulls are not allowed in Miami-Dade County. And, this: Yep, look like full-blown SHIT BULLS to me!
Carmen Reigata killed by dogs (pit "mixes" wink, wink).
Lets crunch some numbers:
- Miami / Dade USA: 5.5 million population.
- United States: 322 million population.
DBRF's in Miami - 1 per year the past 2 years.
DBRF's in USA - 42 per year, as per 2014 statistics.
So, statistically:
You have a 1 in 5.5 million chance of being killed by a dog in Miami.
You have a 1 in 7.6 million chance of being killed by a dog in the greater USA.
From that we can determine that, currently, Miami people have an above average probability of being killed by a dog than your average American. This is in spite of Miami's Pit Bull ban!
See how easy it is to play with numbers? I can set the goalposts anywhere I want. I can "prove" that pit bulls kill less than 1 person every 5 years if I go back to, say, 5000 BC! In any case, statistically, I just destroyed Miami's pit bull restriction even though I find it perfectly legitimate.
In any case, as DPAN pointed out, BSL will wash out in the face of the overall dog culture. The key to a pit bull (or any sort of doggie restriction) is to FIRST undermine the canine supremacy movement. When that is done, THEN and only THEN will the BSL restriction take hold.
Have a great weekend!
Monday, December 7, 2015
BSL Collapse 3.0 - Pit Bulls are Gods.
Another in this series. What is wrong with the BSL movement? Well, #3 on the list is "You refuse to acknowledge the connection to the greater dog
culture. Look, pit bulls are dogs and thus under the protection of The 10 Commandments. What are you going to do about THAT?"
During the height of the Mickey debacle, a few posters made the observation that many Mick supporters had a FaceBook page featuring some toy dog, or even (the horror!) A CAT.
Forget about Per Se pit bull support. Why do toy dog owners, cat owners, and even petless people support MICKEY?
Mick received massive support across all segments of the population because MICK is a DOG. It is THAT simple. Thanks to a 80 year social engineering project by dog lovers, it is now politically incorrect to critique ANY dog for ANY reason! It doesn't really matter if its ALL dogs, a SUB-SET of dogs (i.e. pit bulls) or an individual dog (i.e. Mickey, Goose, Gus, etc... etc... etc...).
Always remember Commandment #5:
It is now a basic social value* that we love each and every dog unconditionally. Since it is a given that the dog's behavior does not matter, how can the dog's parentage matter? If we cannot blame a dog and/or the owner for what it ACTUALLY DID DO, how can we blame it for what it might do?
[*A basic social value is something that EVERYONE is expected to adhere to. Examples would be: Finish school, get a job and always wear clean underwear.]
Therefore, when you push for a pit bull ban you are speaking the unspeakable. You are shoveling against the proverbial tide of Dog Culture. The statistics you put forth are nothing but noise: Is not Fido the arbiter of every outcome? Is not the victim always to blame? Are not the interests of Dog always the overriding consideration? Who cares how many lives are taken by Dog when those lives do not matter, and indeed are Dog's to take?
If you want to get traction on BSL, you must first undermine the dog culture. You must destroy the notion of Dog's overriding superiority. BSL becomes a no brainer upon realization that Dog is NOT a sacred animal NOR is Dog a person. Indeed, Dog has no more right to occupy our spaces than anything else with more than 2 legs. Dog exists to serve us, NOT the other way around. When the rights of a person and the interests of Dog intersect, Dog loses.
During the height of the Mickey debacle, a few posters made the observation that many Mick supporters had a FaceBook page featuring some toy dog, or even (the horror!) A CAT.
Forget about Per Se pit bull support. Why do toy dog owners, cat owners, and even petless people support MICKEY?
Mick received massive support across all segments of the population because MICK is a DOG. It is THAT simple. Thanks to a 80 year social engineering project by dog lovers, it is now politically incorrect to critique ANY dog for ANY reason! It doesn't really matter if its ALL dogs, a SUB-SET of dogs (i.e. pit bulls) or an individual dog (i.e. Mickey, Goose, Gus, etc... etc... etc...).
Always remember Commandment #5:
Thou shalt offer no unkind words
against Dog, nor shalt thou lift a finger against Dog for any reason.
It is now a basic social value* that we love each and every dog unconditionally. Since it is a given that the dog's behavior does not matter, how can the dog's parentage matter? If we cannot blame a dog and/or the owner for what it ACTUALLY DID DO, how can we blame it for what it might do?
[*A basic social value is something that EVERYONE is expected to adhere to. Examples would be: Finish school, get a job and always wear clean underwear.]
Therefore, when you push for a pit bull ban you are speaking the unspeakable. You are shoveling against the proverbial tide of Dog Culture. The statistics you put forth are nothing but noise: Is not Fido the arbiter of every outcome? Is not the victim always to blame? Are not the interests of Dog always the overriding consideration? Who cares how many lives are taken by Dog when those lives do not matter, and indeed are Dog's to take?
If you want to get traction on BSL, you must first undermine the dog culture. You must destroy the notion of Dog's overriding superiority. BSL becomes a no brainer upon realization that Dog is NOT a sacred animal NOR is Dog a person. Indeed, Dog has no more right to occupy our spaces than anything else with more than 2 legs. Dog exists to serve us, NOT the other way around. When the rights of a person and the interests of Dog intersect, Dog loses.
Friday, December 4, 2015
Hegemony
Happy Holidays!
Two murder by dogs in Michigan in two days! Fido is rocking and rolling to make this the BEST year ever! Consider this and this!
On another note...
A new, and if I must say... a very OFFENSIVE Mickey Meme!
Updates on the WMBC page!
Mick has Valley Fever, but not Tick Fever. This may be a good thing, depending on which is more lethal.
Also, MASH is overflowing with dogs! WHAT TO DO? You can donate goods directly via Amazon! Check out their wish list!
Given that I cannot promote any bad behavior, one of these should NOT be delivered to MASH at any time for any reason. Got that? Good.
Two murder by dogs in Michigan in two days! Fido is rocking and rolling to make this the BEST year ever! Consider this and this!
On another note...
A new, and if I must say... a very OFFENSIVE Mickey Meme!
Updates on the WMBC page!
Mick has Valley Fever, but not Tick Fever. This may be a good thing, depending on which is more lethal.
Also, MASH is overflowing with dogs! WHAT TO DO? You can donate goods directly via Amazon! Check out their wish list!
Given that I cannot promote any bad behavior, one of these should NOT be delivered to MASH at any time for any reason. Got that? Good.
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
BSL Collapse 2.0 - the company you keep
Why did I not support The Pit Bull Awareness symposium held on October 24th?
Simple: They aligned themselves with the radical, criminal group PETA. The pit bull victim folks shot themselves in BOTH feet with that major, hump-the-bunk, boner.
PETA fails in every way on every level.
First, the entire concept of animal "rights" is a criminal ideology that directly led to the entire "Mick the Mauler" train wreck. YOU animal rights punks own that disaster lock, stock and barrel! Mick would have been put down but for the pervasive attitude, that YOU promote, that demands that DOGS have full constitutional protections!
OH, and on that note... guess what? PADI the ear-eater's lawyer is now claiming protection under Florida's "stand your ground" laws. Essentially, a DOG has an unconditional right to defend itself against a FOUR YEAR OLD. Thanks, you bottom feeding, scum-sucking, miserable excuses for life. Anyone with any ethics or sense of decency would despise each and every one of you with every particle of their being.
Second, while the entire mission of PETA is complete bullshit, they take it one step further by promoting this criminal ideology with various crimes and intimidation tactics..
Check this out: PETA's "skinned" alive propaganda video was STAGED. The vile, disgusting PETA miscreants ADMIT it themselves, so don't even try to argue it! Indeed, this animal "rights" organization is FINE with torturing animals to death if it promotes their sick, twisted, disgusting, foul organization. Great job, guys!
You like owning pets? PETA wants to ban the owning of pets.
You like eating meat, wearing leather or using ANY animal products in ANY way? PETA wants to ban THOSE, too.
So, yeah, git home from your PETA meeting and feed your cats a can full of dead animals, you scum sucking hypocrites! I fervently hope that MICKEY eats your face off. Kiss my ass you pieces of shit!
EDIT: Read this to learn more about PETA.
“I don’t believe that people have the right to life,” Newkirk has said. “That’s a supremacist perversion. A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.”
STILL think that PETA endorsement helps you out? If humans have no right to life, who cares how many are killed by pit bulls? Indeed, human lives do not matter.
Simple: They aligned themselves with the radical, criminal group PETA. The pit bull victim folks shot themselves in BOTH feet with that major, hump-the-bunk, boner.
PETA fails in every way on every level.
First, the entire concept of animal "rights" is a criminal ideology that directly led to the entire "Mick the Mauler" train wreck. YOU animal rights punks own that disaster lock, stock and barrel! Mick would have been put down but for the pervasive attitude, that YOU promote, that demands that DOGS have full constitutional protections!
OH, and on that note... guess what? PADI the ear-eater's lawyer is now claiming protection under Florida's "stand your ground" laws. Essentially, a DOG has an unconditional right to defend itself against a FOUR YEAR OLD. Thanks, you bottom feeding, scum-sucking, miserable excuses for life. Anyone with any ethics or sense of decency would despise each and every one of you with every particle of their being.
Second, while the entire mission of PETA is complete bullshit, they take it one step further by promoting this criminal ideology with various crimes and intimidation tactics..
Check this out: PETA's "skinned" alive propaganda video was STAGED. The vile, disgusting PETA miscreants ADMIT it themselves, so don't even try to argue it! Indeed, this animal "rights" organization is FINE with torturing animals to death if it promotes their sick, twisted, disgusting, foul organization. Great job, guys!
You like owning pets? PETA wants to ban the owning of pets.
You like eating meat, wearing leather or using ANY animal products in ANY way? PETA wants to ban THOSE, too.
So, yeah, git home from your PETA meeting and feed your cats a can full of dead animals, you scum sucking hypocrites! I fervently hope that MICKEY eats your face off. Kiss my ass you pieces of shit!
EDIT: Read this to learn more about PETA.
“I don’t believe that people have the right to life,” Newkirk has said. “That’s a supremacist perversion. A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.”
STILL think that PETA endorsement helps you out? If humans have no right to life, who cares how many are killed by pit bulls? Indeed, human lives do not matter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)