The owners of yard barkers invest a considerable effort
in evading their obligations. I believe
if they invested HALF of that effort in simply controlling their dogs the
barking dog scourge would not exist.
A neighbor with a chronic barker is a death of a thousand
cuts. My brother was a dog attack victim
and is NOW a bark victim and that barking has taken an even more significant
toll. The great dane next door wakes him
up EVERY NIGHT. He is working on getting
the miscreant evicted, and she should be gone shortly. He also got treated to a bag full of dog
shit on his front porch the other week… I wonder who’s it was? Absolutely CHARMING.
Barking is a toxic pollutant and intolerable irritant. It is used as a torture method by military
and police organizations. Not bothered
by barking? Well, the shrill, abrupt
noises DO affect you whether you realize it or not. It affects your body’s endocrinal and
autonomous nervous system: You do NOT “tune
it out” people! As a matter of fact, it’s
rather like secondhand smoke, but faster acting! It destroys property values and makes people
sick. It does absolutely NO ONE any good, including
the dog!
How can animal welfare organizations not take the lead on
this? They claim to be “animal lovers” but
have no problem allowing an animal to bark until it is hoarse and
exhausted? Do they think that a dog that
barks throughout the day and night is a happy dog? Either they are idiots or they think that
everyone else is: Yes, I am sure that
the dog chained to a truck axle 24x7 and barking nonstop is a happy, well
adjusted dog. Pfft! Pursuant to my “rock and a hard place” essay,
the upswing in noise pollution contributes heavily to the PR disaster for dogs
and owners in general. SHAME ON THEM.
Hey Dummy: The dog
chained to a truck axle and barking 24x7 is TOTALLY MISERABLE, has NO QUALITY
OF LIFE and that is NO WAY for ANY CREATURE TO LIVE. Their entire world is a patch of bare dirt
packed with urine and feces. They are
subject to any and all kinds of weather.
They are vulnerable to predators. They get no exercise. They have no socialization. In my opinion, you’d be better off putting it
down before subjecting it to a miserable life like that. ALL outdoor penning, tethering and chaining should
be summarily banned: Any animal kept in
such conditions should be impounded IMMEDIATELY and the owner banned from
owning pets FOREVER. Anyone who would
create this problem is a low-life who deserves nothing but contempt from
EVERYONE. They torment their animals and
destroy human health in the process.
DOWN WITH THEM.
The above is #9 on my “Why is it so annoying, anyway?”
list. Anyone who has even a molecule of
compassion for any animal will be driven insane by the endless screams of the miserable,
tormented animal across the street.
The list of mindless drivel spewed by these miscreants
continues. Numbering scheme picks up
where Part III left off. Note that ALL
of these talking points are used to excuse the behavior of dangerous dogs as
well.
16) He is doing his job. Their point being, they have “hired”
their dog to bark at anything and everything day and night. So, when he barks at you when you are walking
from your house to your car, he is really a “good dog” as the entire neighborhood
needs to be “alerted” about that exceptional event, especially at 2am.
Counterpoints:
He needs a change in job description.
If I hired someone to yell at you all the time, would you accept this
excuse? I doubt that. “Doing my/his job” did not work at Nuremburg
and it doesn’t work here either, pal. FAIL.
17) He was provoked. This is similar to “He is doing his job”. Their point being, the dog (and by reference,
the owner) are fully empowered to set off a loud alarm throughout the community
at even the most trivial event: A leaf
falling, a neighbor looking out the window, the wind blowing, someone walking
down the street, etc… etc… ad nauseum.
Counterpoints:
The threshold for setting off a loud alarm is very high. You don’t set off the city air-raid siren
every time you see a bird flying overhead.
You don’t set off the fire alarm in a hotel because you saw someone smoking
a cigarette on TV, or you are bored and want attention. So, why do you and your dog get to do THE
SAME THING? False alarms are toxic and
counterproductive. False alarms are a crime, buddy. From now on, confine your noises to your OWN
space. FAIL.
18) You don’t understand dog behavior. Their
point being, the endless loud barking really DOES serve a worthwhile purpose
but it is way over the head of us unwashed, uneducated rabble. Moreover, you must have a complete
understanding of the torture device in question before offering any criticism.
Counterpoints:
A complete understanding of the weapon in question is irrelevant. I could just as easily shoot your dog with an
AK-47 and claim “YOU do not know of Kalashnikov’s genius you troglodyte!”. All
I need to know is that you and your dog kept a sick kid up all night and now they
have to go to the hospital. Keep trying,
champ. FAIL.
19) Why don’t you just move? Their point being, they are lords of the
land and can do anything to anybody within the (their) jurisdiction. Therefore, if you take issue with their reign
of terror, you must leave the (their) kingdom.
Counterpoints:
Credit to commenter “LDS” on this one:
This is a good one! This fails on
MANY levels. First, do they REALLY want me to move out and thus force real
estate and rental values down further?
They have to examine what it’s truly worth to them to maintain their
barking lawn ornament. Second, they are NOT lords of the land
and they have a responsibility to confine their noises to THEIR space. Third,
if you are forced to move due to someone else’s bad behavior, that sounds like
a juicy actionable tort to me. OK, I am
not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV, but if you are forced out of your home by
a neighbor wouldn’t they be liable for your moving expenses? You are away from the miscreant at THEIR
expense! Again, I am not giving legal
advice but it’s something to consider. Lastly,
I should NOT alter my behavior to suit YOUR consumer choice to own a dog AND
house it in lousy conditions: I am going
to stay PUT and YOU are going to stop raising the noise level in my home! You lose, buttercup. FAIL.
20) It is a rescue. This is from esteemed colleague “Your Quiet
Neighbor” (on my blogs list to the right).
I’d heard this one from the scumbags across the street but had forgotten
about it. In any case, their (the
scumbag’s) point being: I have “rescued”
this dog from a shelter and as such are hereby entitled to a pass on any and
all behavior against the dog and everyone else.
The fact that they paid 50 bucks to the county shelter, took a dog home
and tied it to a tree in their yard (leaving it there 24x7) to yell and scream
endlessly elevates them WAY past level of Mother Teresa. They are truly God’s among us! We should bow down at their feet.
Counterpoints:
They are in fact, complete bottom feeding low life scum. They are unspeakably vile. They are pukes. Part of this problem belongs to society at
large that grants so much social capital on “rescuers”. As per Your Quiet Neighbor, the term “rescue”
belongs to those who truly rise above the day to day, go beyond the call of
duty, and risk all to help another. The
term “rescue” has been completely degraded by these miscreants. In any case, their newfound “status” does NOT
entitle them to disrupt all of my interests with their vile, disgusting
behavior.
My low life neighbors used this on ME. Take a look at this video and let me know
what you think of these “rescuers”. Note
there is a colorful expletive in the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WllgRemK4ss
The doghouse was way too small for him and probably
flooded out. And, yes, the owners WERE
home. Some RESCUE, isn’t it? I was forced to listen to this vile garbage
for months. Some “heroes”!
End of the road dirtbag.
FAIL.
@ AU: "Either [animal welfare orgs] are idiots or they think that everyone else is."
ReplyDeleteThis one ain't either-or; it's both.
An awful lot of AWOs are made up of unschooled amateurs with 1) a Walt Disney sentimentality about animals, and 2) zero understanding of any of the species they deal with. Unfortunately, the imbecility has -- as far as dogs go -- penetrated into academic circles as well (though there I call it intellectual prostitution); an awful lot of people with PhDs say things as stupid as any amateur would say. So hiring 'experts' often doesn't help much re animal orgs.
As it is, the AWOs go through the motions of talking about responsible ownership and persuading people to take good care of their animals. But at the same time, and much more strongly, they continue to promote the dog as a consumer article that no one can be denied. They promote a Walt Disney sentimentality that considers it a Shakesperean tragedy if a dog, any dog, is put down. They continue to encourage breeding (never mind what their mouths say, and never mind free spay/neuter clinics), by resisting regulation of dog breeders or any dog breed. I know you'll get tired of hearing it, but I've been around long enough to know this all started with the pit-bull advocacy. If owning a pit bull (and breeding them) is a civil right (or even a Constitutional one), then owning (and breeding) any dog must be. If you can’t chain a dog in your yard, what will 90% of the pit owners do? Take the teeth out of Animal Control, because otherwise they’ll be confiscating pit bulls. If it's a tragedy to (gently BTW) kill a pit bull that has just horribly mauled someone, then it certainly must be a tragedy to put down some non-killer dog. If we don’t take it seriously that (a particular type of) dogs are mauling and killing our children (which the humane societies APPARENTLY don’t), then how can you expect anyone to take mere barking seriously?
Maybe it’s not so much that the AWO idiots think the rest of us are idiots, as that we’ve proven we are.
I hope it doesn’t irritate you that I bring up the vicious breeds issue again and again. It’s just that while the barking may seem a separate problem to those who suffer it, and while I recognize that it’s a huge problem and real suffering, I do really think there’s a relation between the two phenomena. I believe that solving the one will solve the other in the end, because once the ‘right’ to own a killer dog is demolished, we’ll have the slippery slope where all other dog-owner ‘rights’ are reduced to privileges that can be taken away.
[See also my ‘let’s reverse the slippery slope’ comment from awhile ago, at your entry http://animaluncontrol.blogspot.nl/2012/03/right-privilege-or-something-else.html ]
Hello Sweetie Pie:
ReplyDeleteI don't take issue with bringing up dangerous dogs, its a very relevant issue.
Your reply is good enough that I may dedicate an entire post to it. I am hiking this weekend so may not get to it until next week. A few thoughts, though:
A few words onn "rescuing": Its worth saying that some lives (animal AND human) are simply not worth saving. Again, what kind of a "Rescue" is it if the animal in question is sentenced to a life of misery AND the health and safety of the surrounding community is compromised by this "rescue". In the net, its a lose-lose-lose:
- The dog loses.
- The owner loses.
- The community loses.
A few words on dangerous dogs: As per my "rock and a hard place" essay, the Pit Bull problem (or something like it) was proverbially "baked in the cake"... When we adopted a culture that favors the interests of individual dogs and dog owners over public safety, a problem of that scope was inevitable. I would not be surprised if the problem became even WORSE given that (dangerous) dog behavior has almost no limits placed upon it. What will they breed next... Cane Corsos? Presa Canarios? Maybe something we haven't thought of yet?