Sunday, March 27, 2016

Mickety MickMick Mickers!

Allahu Mickbar and Happy Easter my friends!   Just when you thought it was safe to walk the streets, the Mickmaster train wreck continues!


Don't you just LOVE the smug arrogance on display, here?  Not only are they defying a court order, but they are doing it out in the open!  They even advertise it on the Watch Mickey Beat Cancer Page!

While not sure of the precise details, I am confident that the above is a flagrant violation of a court order.  Wasn't the mutt supposed to be confined in the jail, or similar facility, for the rest of its life?  I suppose they could argue that the beast is being "escorted" by a law enforcement official, thus putting it into a grey area, but WHAT THE HELL PEOPLE?!

Dog nutters really love to push the envelope... they keep doing it until something happens, then blame someone else!  

Consider this - what happens if Mick attacks someone while on one of these leisurely strolls?   They sure as hell can't argue that they didn't know the dog was dangerous... it was sentenced to life for attacking a kid!   I suppose one line of defense might be that they argue that Mickey isn't really "THE" Mickey of internet fame, merely another Bulldog that looks like St. Mick.   Of course, then they would be forced to declare that Mickey is a Fake.   Would be VERY interesting to watch that unfold.

I estimate that these folks actually believe their own BS - that if they love a dog enough, it becomes totally harmless.  ALL dog bites are due to abuse and neglect, right?  That is why its always the victim's fault... they must have done something to antagonize poor Fido!  

On a slightly different note, the internet frenzy over dear MickBar has not subsided.  Forces are at work to white-wash the past of the Dear Mickster.  Consider this sobby story.   In short, a dog with flowers on its head would never hurt anybody.  How can you argue seamless logic like that?



As usual:





Enjoy the rest of your weekend!


21 comments:

  1. I thought it was supposed to muzzled ? Yes I seen the flowered headdress on the mangler . How is Kevin. You know the child mauled by the dog that the nutters have managed to erase from the FB page ? Poor Mickster has cancer ya know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think muzzling in public was part of the original deal. My understanding is the mutt was supposed to be permanently confined. Period.

      Delete
    2. The muzzling was supposed , I think to happen when it was being transported to the vet. Which of course is a moot point since the thing is housed in a kennel situation with a vet in house. Though there is no way to know since IT is kept at an undisclosed location.
      All pits are good pits. Until they aren't.
      That public parade is a direct violation of the court order. Kevin's attorney should be calling for the needle.

      Delete
    3. I think part of the problem is that the original "agreement" / "deal" or whatever you want to call it was not well thought out. I don't think there was any provision for taking the mutt to the vet (although the vet could always make a "jail call"). My point is, there need not be a provision for muzzling as the mutt should not be out of confinement for any reason.

      All of this simply reinforces the point that known maulers should never be allowed to live. We can't trust the "system" to properly confine them. Additionally, granting DOGS due process rights is a terrible use of public funds and other resources. DOGS ARE NOT PEOPLE!

      Delete
    4. I'm not arguing the thing should have been dirt napped or kept in a sealed cage. You are correct. And in the case of Mickey the lunatics are running the asylum. Removing the dog from the scum lawyers grasp and placing it in a neutral setting were no one was emotionally vested should have been ordered. After all. Family doesn't get to dictate where their loved ones do time. Nor do inmates get web cams. or goody boxes. I thought they were afraid of ninjas and snipers should the dog make a daylight appearance ?

      Delete
  2. Further to the case of Stella the dog I mentioned on a previous post, US pitbull advocates became involved to little effect since the police seem to have held the line:

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/02/caged-dog-stella-offer-new-home-us-animal-sanctuary-connecticut

    https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/News/NewsArticle.aspx?id=57f4cd44-06a7-4486-904b-d501b8e9410d

    https://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/News/NewsArticle.aspx?id=2347e57f-745b-49d9-8f70-b54a30607d2a

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9Clxi_sswE

    In other news the UK Sentencing Council have released new guidelines for dangerous dog offences that I thought might interest you:

    http://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/news/item/sentencing-council-launches-new-revised-definitive-guideline-for-sentencing-dangerous-dog-offences/

    http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/caroline-kisko/dangerous-dogs-versus-dangerous-owners_b_9487284.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the info, I'll look deeper into that when I get a chance.

      The dog freaks are a traveling road show that move from place to place to grant the superficial appearance of a grass-roots support for supermaulers in either the macro or the micro.

      This scenario plays out over and over. Pursuant to the article above, were all of the "Mickey" supporters from Maricopa county, or Arizona, or even the United States?

      Padi is a similar case. Legions of dog nutters descended upon Manatee County, FL to pressure authorities to give a full pass to the mutt! These are not Manatee people, or even Florida people... they are a highly mobile freak show that moves from locale to locale promoting dangerous dog rights.

      Delete
    2. Freak shows were deformed humans making a living the only way society allowed. The dog freaks are mental deviants. It's so easy to click on a cause or sign an online petition no matter who you are. Also consider the warped and twisted wording used to incite the low intelligence useful idiot. Somehow in the minds of these twits a seed was planted that The Mauler didn't really mean to rip off half the child's face.
      Friend told me once how lucky he was. His horse tried to kick him and missed. Looked him straight in the eye and told him if the horse had meant to make contact it would have. The dog knew exactly where it's teeth were going. The only innocent victim is Kevin. The rest of the players probably should have all faced some type of child abuse/endangerment charges.

      Delete
  3. There's always hope that Arpaio will take the supposedly cancerous monster home for a night, and that it will kill him.

    Then his children can do what most nutters do: honor Arpaio's memory by either burying the cancerous pit ashes in the casket with him, or (if they succeed in yet again 'saving' the Mick') bring the cancer patient to Arpaio's funeral.

    An alternative scenario occurs to me too. Arpaio takes the mauler home, it kills one of his children or grandchildren, and he tells the 'took away a bone' story...then blithely returns to the sheriff's office with the killer.

    If your parent or your child likes pit bulls, don't count on them to care if they see you dead on their living room floor:

    "WBTV has learned that the dogs' owner, the victim's daughter, didn't want to sign the dogs over - so animal control officers seized the dogs."

    http://www.wbtv.com/story/31581065/elderly-woman-killed-by-dogs-at-south-charlotte-home

    ReplyDelete
  4. "I was heartbroken and angry, and for the next few days, I watched Mickey and I cried. I watched him for hours."

    As if the photos of Mickey with flowers on his butt ugly head weren't sickening enough! Reading just a few lines of that idiotic article was too much.

    ReplyDelete
  5. BTW what was the justification for this dog being out of confinement an open violation of the court order ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure there was no good reason for it. What is the possible need to walk the mauler around on a city street?

      They are rubbing our (Mick critics) noses in it. They are broadcasting that they can do whatever they want in the NAME OF DOG and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

      Delete
    2. I call this kind of behavior Testing the Waters. Sheriff Joke should be booted out of office for flaunting a court order.

      Delete
  6. That second flowers-on-the-head photo looks to me as if it's been photoshopped to make the Mickster smile. Either that or all those vet visits have been for surgery on its mouth to make it less vicious-looking.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm curious , Was there any reference to where this was taken ? Or the exact date.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No info on that. It was posted on the WMBC page.

      It appears to be a densely populated downtown area. Phoenix, maybe?

      Delete
    2. It seems oddly out of place and there is no info just a picture. I looked on the mauler site.
      I thought the new wonderful country club he had to be moved to had in house vet services. If not there was no justification for moving him for his cell. Which leaves zero reasons for this to go on , which makes me wonder how old this picture is.

      Delete
    3. I suppose the pic could have been taken at any point after Kevin's mauling.... a little over 2 years ago. Perhaps even prior to the "sentencing", in which case it may have been legal. Who knows?

      I suspect it may be fairly recent, say within the past 6 months or so. I say that, because at inception, there was a lot of "heat" on the mutt - public scrutiny. At this time, I believe Mick's 15 minutes of fame are over: No one cares enough to do much, and Mick's handlers know it.

      Delete
  8. A bit off track I know but does anyone know what's happened to 'Ha! Ha! Mickey's Webcam is Gone'? (For those unaware it is/was a site that made common sense comments about the over-the-top comments on Save Mickey.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Facebook maintains a version of political correctness with an iron fist. I estimate that they took that page down upon hearing complaints about "hate speech" against the dog. Remember, dogs are a protected class of "people" and anything other than the most mild criticism is not tolerated by the speech police.

      The original "I hate dogs" Facebook page was taken down by Facebook a couple of years ago for promoting "hate" against dogs. There is a newer "I hate dogs" page, but its essentially just a troll page - nothing that would gain traction against the dog disciples. With that in mind, a page that made common sense, logical arguments against the dog theocracy would likely be the first to go down. The powers-that-be must maintain the negative stereotype of anyone who is even mildly critical of dogs and dog owners, else the entire rotten edifice would implode. That said, they will take down the factual, logical pages and leave up the troll pages to promote the image of dog-critics as eeeeevilllll HATERZZZZ!

      Delete