Thursday, May 28, 2015

Free at Last!

Mick has been moved from the jail to his new digs!  And, it appears to have cured his cancer!

I'm sure everyone is doing the happy dance:


From the WMBC page:



Note that I spiced that pic up a little.

Take a deep breath and STAY HAPPY!

[UPDATE]  News video on the incident.


Schill is a classic:  "Not a Victim"?   Know what, I need to take back what I said above.... these people are not degenerates, and calling them that is insulting.... TO DEGENERATES!

Sure, PERHAPS Schill had no obligation to notify the family.  How about authorities?  Does ANYONE represent the victim or We the People in any dog related matter?  How did this come about?  Is there even a trace of legality anywhere in this debacle?  The dog is sick, so lets just let him off the hook?  These scumbags (and that includes the authorities) are making a mockery of our justice system.

On a better note, there is some hope for humanity:

I LIKE those odds. 

37 comments:

  1. check your email. i am sending you a little something i made. it is more appropriate for your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No one is happy except for the Cult of the Walking Meat Grinder. May there be a special place in hell for the whole lot of degenerates.

    ReplyDelete
  3. He has cancer but the FB posted the scan didn't show any internal tumors. To date the only tumors he's had are on the skin and easily removed.
    So if this is a manageable cancer that could have been taken care of with a trip to the vet on occasion you have to question is he sicker than reported or was the cancer simply being used as a ploy to spring Mickey.
    I suspect the latter.
    Was there a second opinion presented by a neutral party or a lawyer representing Kevin. Would a Guardian ad Litem be appropriate here.
    It seems to me this whole shindig should be deemed invalid until there is a real hearing.
    If this Mauler is so sick he needs 24/7 vet attention , considering his status he should be put down.
    His confinement was in place of the needle. The dog should only be afforded reasonable care not extraordinary.
    Advocates for victims take note. The next dog to get off the hook make sure there are a complete range of provisions. This dog now has a few paws out the door to being the pet next door.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "It seems to me this whole shindig should be deemed invalid until there is a real hearing. "

    Agreed. There is no way this debacle is truly legal. The problem is, no one is officially challenging it so the shysters get away with it.

    If this Mauler is so sick he needs 24/7 vet attention , considering his status he should be put down."

    Any animal that is that sick should be put down regardless of its legal status. Keeping it alive in misery accomplishes what? The foamers all think that dogs are people but they are not - keeping a terminally ill animal alive serves absolutely no purpose.

    Of course, keeping a mauler alive also serves absolutely no purpose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kevin has been reduced to the value of a chewed up bathroom rug.

      Delete
    2. Schill's comment about Kevin not being a victim is the 2nd half of a cheap bait 'n switch routine. All along, he baits us with a demand that dogs should have 5th amendment protections (something reserved for PEOPLE). Then, he insists that the "victim" is not a true victim because the dog is not really a person and what happened was a pure accident, sort of like falling off a ladder.

      Delete
    3. I'm sure he argued that this was not about the mauling but the dog's medical needs. Even though it breaks the judges order the dog be confined for life in exchange for not being disposed of.
      What provision if any did this judge make if Mickey's health improves ? We don't seem to be allowed to know.

      Delete
    4. Kevin isn't a victim because a dog mauling or killing someone isn't against the law - it's a civil matter. No law broken, no victim. Legal speaking, of course.

      Of course, on the other hand, if someone had inflicted the same wounds to Mickey, that would be felony animal abuse. People wonder why I'm so sick of dogs and their owners.

      Delete
    5. You're not the only one who's sick of dogs and their owners, Anon. And, guess what, due to cases like this one, our numbers are growing larger.

      Delete
    6. The judge has broken the law in this case by not following the law. U.S. SUPREME COURT, SENTELL v. NEW ORLEANS & C. R. CO., April 26, 1897
      Laws for the protection of domestic animals are regarded as having but a limited application to dogs and cats; and, regardless of statute, a ferocious dog is looked upon as hostis humani generis, and as having no right to his life which man is bound to respect.

      Delete
  5. Has that been applied to other cases Ka D ?

    Anonymous, you are correct. I just feel a little sick thinking of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My reason for posting that is because it seems clear that the judge in this ruling ignored a Supreme Court decision and made her own law. That is NOT the function of a judge. Their job is to obey and rule on the laws that already exist. I think any judge making their own law should be summarily discharged.

      Delete
    2. Just as bad as making the law up as they go along. Giving into internet petitions which equals mob rule.

      Delete
    3. They are making up the law as they go along. They get away with it because no one is officially challenging them.

      If Kevin's family had means or were politically connected the dog would have been dead within days of the incident. TLP (The Lexus Project) and Schill moved in for the proverbial kill because they correctly anticipated there would be no official resistance to saving the dog.

      Again, in anything dog related, no one represents the victim or the public. Each and every one of us is completely on our own against a raging horde of dog fanatics.

      Delete
  6. If Sociopath Schill's argument is that he has no legal obligation to inform Kevin's family that Child Mauling Mickey has been transferred to a different facility, than how does he explain the fact that he even took on Mickey's case PRO BONO? After all, he has NO LEGAL OBLIGATION to present that devil dog in court in the first place, right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would be very interested to get an expert legal opinion of this entire matter. Again, there is no official opposition to Schill and his ilk. Nobody represents the victim or the public.

      Last time I checked, dogs are not people and as such have no right to legal representation. The owner yes, but the dog? No. IANAL, but one would think that any suit, writ, brief, pleading, etc.... submitted on behalf of a DOG would be deemed invalid and summarily thrown out. Again, the problem here is that no one is challenging this behavior so it seems that Schill, Arpaio and that ilk can do pretty much whatever they want.

      Delete
    2. These Jackasses are even more deranged than the mauler the put on a pedestal.

      Delete
    3. T. Sean Shannon - SNL - Wade Blasingame, Esq. on Vimeo ;)

      I started with pain and suffering. All the cases I found that were viable were for the owner of the pet not the pet itself. A question I have is who is the legal owner of the dog at the time he sued. It follows logic that the owner of the mauler would have had to consent to let slimeball sue on his behalf. Was this the state ? I believe the dog had been surrendered and was at the MASH unit ? I believe even the Lexus Project says they can't act until the owners ask them to step in ?




      Delete
    4. Eileen - RE: Mick's owner. My understanding is that this individual (the name of which has not been divulged so far as I can tell), surrendered Mick to the county immediately after the attack on Kevin. I don't know if they signed a euthanization order or not. It was apparent that they wanted absolutely nothing to do with Mickey after the incident. Mick was property of the government when TLP stepped in. Schill is representing the dog not the owner or the owner's interests.

      In typical nutter fashion, many of the Mick foamers carry on about how Mickey was neglected, starved, abused, etc... NONE of them are demanding the owner be held accountable. If its all about the owner, why aren't they going after HIM?

      More bait and switch: Carry on about owner responsibility, then when something happens place all the blame on the victim.

      Anyone interested in trolling the WMBC page might

      Delete
    5. Sorry, hit publish before I was finished....

      Anyone interested in trolling the WMBC page might want to ask if anyone has considered going after the owner. Didn't this guy raise the dog to attack other dogs and little kids? Do these people carry any accountability, or not?

      Delete
    6. I believe like a lot of others this was a case of opportunity to advance dog rights. An Illegal impoverished woman and her anchor baby in Maricopa County AZ with Sheriff Joe taking the mutt in. The world exploitation comes to mind.
      What about Kevin's human rights ? Why weren't charges filed. The owners admit they chained it up after killing another dog. They had foreknowledge the dog was dangerous.
      By pressing charges against the owners the whole story is going to come out. Wanna bet it was more than one dog or incident that got him chained in the yard. They don't want ' those people ' going on record in court.
      This was for want of better words. A perfect storm for the AR crowd. Pit Bull owners especially.

      Delete
    7. "I believe like a lot of others this was a case of opportunity to advance dog rights.

      That is an excellent summation of the issue. I believe that AR nuts and dog cultists own this one lock, stock, and barrel! Thats why I wrote a few years ago that, when THEIR dog gets torn up by another dog, at least part of the blame falls on THEM: THEY created this regime, now THEY have to live with it. Hoist with their own petards, they are!

      What does that mean, dog lovers? Well, the dog that killed your dog just lawyered up so be ready for years of endless motions, trials, hearings, depositions and the like.

      Delete
    8. Indeed. Mickey was not mauling the child he was detaining the bone burglar until help arrived.














      Delete
  7. If Sociopathic Schill's argument is that he has no legal obligation to inform Kevin's family that Child Mauling Mickey has been transferred to a different facility, than how does he explain the fact that he even took on Mickey's case PRO BONO? After all, he has NO LEGAL OBLIGATION to present that devil dog in court in the first place, right?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Was the prayer blankie sabotaged ?

    ReplyDelete
  9. If you watch Mickey...I watched the YouTube with Schill explaining why Kevin had no rights. He is truly a repulsive human being. The human part may be debatable. He even looks oily.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Eileen-Oh I know, I have been disgusted and appalled for 2 days. Hope he likes me cover photo ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If You Watch Mickey On Webcam You Seriously Need To Get a LifeMay 30, 2015 at 11:32 PM

      *my cover photo

      Delete
    2. The most interesting part of the YouTube was that once removed from his frothing fans adoring butt kissing he looked like the low life he is.

      Delete
  11. I might be able to help Mr Schill regarding the case in which Kevin is a victim, as he appeared not to know.

    I quote from this article:

    http://www.azfamily.com/story/28382619/phoenix-boy-mauled-by-dog-becomes-victim-of-scam

    "Kevin has been through enough," said John Schill, the attorney who defended the pit bull named Mickey. "He’s a victim in this case. He doesn’t need to be victimized again."

    So, in answer to his recent question, "In what case?", it's this one. The one where Mickey mauled Kevin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wonder why he changed his mind and was being a complete ass.

      He has always been a complete ass. He never gave a shit about Kevin. The difference is that, his confidence has increased, and he no longer needs to fake it.

      Delete
  12. From day one Schill has claimed it was Kevin's fault. After all - All children are taught not to take a bone from a dog from birth. Anything he said about Kevin being a victim was pure crocodile tears to achieve his main objective.
    Wonder if they're going to have to chop off Mickey's leg ? It wouldn't bother the nuts. They have their own assortment of two legged and deformed dogs that are just too cute. I bet if they whack off a leg Mickey will gain even more points on the cute meter.

    ReplyDelete
  13. How stupid can they get?

    From the WMBC page: Our boy is still very happy despite the bad news.

    Bad news? How the hell can a DOG understand a cancer diagnosis? I tell you, these people must literally think life is some Disney cartoon: "Give it to me straight, Doc, am I going to make it?"

    ReplyDelete